On Jun 29, 2007, at 3:25 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Added a note to the docs that pg_start_backup can take a long
time to finish now that we spread out checkpoints:
I was starting to wordsmith this, and then wondered whether it
On Jun 29, 2007, at 4:25 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Added a note to the docs that pg_start_backup can take a long
time to finish now that we spread out checkpoints:
I was starting to wordsmith this, and then wondered whether
Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Added a note to the docs that pg_start_backup can take a long time to
finish now that we spread out checkpoints:
I was starting to wordsmith this, and then wondered whether it's not
just a stupid idea for pg_start_backup to act tha
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Added a note to the docs that pg_start_backup can take a long time to
> > finish now that we spread out checkpoints:
>
> I was starting to wordsmith this, and then wondered whether it's not
> j
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Added a note to the docs that pg_start_backup can take a long time to
> finish now that we spread out checkpoints:
I was starting to wordsmith this, and then wondered whether it's not
just a stupid idea for pg_start_backup to act that way. The rea