Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Hiroshi Saito wrote: From: Andrew Dunstan Hiroshi Saito wrote: Hmm, It seems to be the bug of very unpleasant Microsoft.:D I think that the following is desirable as an evasion measure to add. #if defined(_MSC_VER) _MSC_VER == 1400 To be sure, it was only VS2005.

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-26 Thread Florian G. Pflug
Bruce Momjian wrote: Why is this better than: #if _MSC_VER == 1400 Surely this will not be true if _MSC_VER is undefined? I experienced injustice and the reason of in OSX for it. What was the problem with OSX? Did it throw a warning of you did an equality test on an undefined symbol?

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-26 Thread andrew
Bruce Momjian wrote: Why is this better than: #if _MSC_VER == 1400 Surely this will not be true if _MSC_VER is undefined? I experienced injustice and the reason of in OSX for it. What was the problem with OSX? Did it throw a warning of you did an equality test on an undefined symbol?

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-26 Thread Florian G. Pflug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Why is this better than: #if _MSC_VER == 1400 Surely this will not be true if _MSC_VER is undefined? I experienced injustice and the reason of in OSX for it. What was the problem with OSX? Did it throw a warning of you did an equality test on

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-26 Thread Hiroshi Saito
From: Florian G. Pflug Ahhh, It is right.! I was retracing my memory for what situations the contents were. I was in distraction.It seems that it is satisfactory at the reason for ==. Sorry and Thanks.!! Regards, Hiroshi Saito Bruce Momjian wrote: Why is this better than: #if

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-25 Thread Tom Lane
William ZHANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When I tried to compile pgsql-8.2devel with VS.Net 2005 and do regression tests, I found the problem. It's a bug inVS.Net 2005: http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=99694 So why don't you use the fixed version

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-25 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. William ZHANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] When I tried to compile pgsql-8.2devel with VS.Net 2005 and do regression tests, I found the problem. It's a bug inVS.Net 2005: http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=99694

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Hiroshi Saito wrote: Hmm, It seems to be the bug of very unpleasant Microsoft.:D I think that the following is desirable as an evasion measure to add. #if defined(_MSC_VER) _MSC_VER == 1400 To be sure, it was only VS2005. Why is this better than: #if _MSC_VER == 1400 Surely this

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch for VS.Net 2005's strxfrm() bug

2006-07-25 Thread Hiroshi Saito
From: Andrew Dunstan Hiroshi Saito wrote: Hmm, It seems to be the bug of very unpleasant Microsoft.:D I think that the following is desirable as an evasion measure to add. #if defined(_MSC_VER) _MSC_VER == 1400 To be sure, it was only VS2005. Why is this better than: