Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-25 Thread Dave Page
quot;<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Chuck McDevitt"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "pgsql-patches@postgresql.org", "PostgreSQL-development" Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support Does this fix IPv6 on Win32? --

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe so, yes, although I think that we should remove the > HAVE_GETADDRINFO compile time test that Tom built into initdb.c the other > day, so that it can fall through to this code. Will do. BTW, when we are using getaddrinfo.c, is the gai_strer

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thanks, added. --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Bruce Momjian said: > > > > OK, we need text for the release notes. What would it be? > > How about this?: > > . Support for connections over IPv6 on Windows platforms capable of

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I believe so, yes, although I think that we should remove the HAVE_GETADDRINFO compile time test that Tom built into initdb.c the other day, so that it can fall through to this code. cheers andrew Bruce Momjian said: > > Does this fix IPv6 on Win32? > >

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, we need text for the release notes. What would it be? --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > I believe so, yes, although I think that we should remove the > HAVE_GETADDRINFO compile time test that Tom built into initdb.c the

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Bruce Momjian said: > > OK, we need text for the release notes. What would it be? How about this?: . Support for connections over IPv6 on Windows platforms capable of it. (Chuck McDevitt, Petr Jelinek, Magnus Hagander, Andrew Dunstan). cheers andrew ---(end of bro

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Context diff, please, diff -c. > It needed dos2unix and pgindent as well. Here's a cleaned patch. > Thanks to Chuck for doing this work. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Does this fix IPv6 on Win32? --- Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Context diff, please, diff -c. > > > It needed dos2unix and pgindent as well. Here's a cleaned patch. > > Thanks to Chuck fo

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-24 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Bruce Momjian wrote: Context diff, please, diff -c. It needed dos2unix and pgindent as well. Here's a cleaned patch. Thanks to Chuck for doing this work. cheers andrew *** src/port/getaddrinfo.c 2005-07-28 00:03:14.0 -0400 --- /home/andrew/getaddrinfo.c 2005-08-24 16:04:29.0

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support IPv6 on Windows

2005-08-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Context diff, please, diff -c. --- Chuck McDevitt wrote: > I'm proposing this change to /src/port/getaddrinfo.c to support IPv6 > under windows. > > > > 10a11,14 > > > * Windows may or may not have these routines, so w