On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:09 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
I am actively working on this now, after some delays because of other
calls on my time. The suggested changes have needed more rework than I
estimated, touching most lines of the patch, but I d
Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > 3. Should the WALWriter also do the wal_buffers half-full write at the
> > > start of XLogInsert() ?
> >
> > That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
> > wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
> > many dirty wal buff
Simon Riggs wrote:
> > That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
> > wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
> > many dirty wal buffers accumulate.
>
> Yes
>
>
> I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
I have seen no patch yet with
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > transaction_guarantee.v11.patch
Thanks for the review.
> I can't help feeling that this is enormously overcomplicated.
I agree with all but one of your comments, see below.
> The "DFC" in partic
