Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()

2008-06-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Can we conclude this has been tested enough for 8.4? --- Magnus Hagander wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > It looks pretty good from here. I have an output of about 50 million > > > lines, and th

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()

2008-05-07 Thread Magnus Hagander
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > It looks pretty good from here. I have an output of about 50 million > > lines, and the only FATAL stuff is the "terminating due to admin > > command". All other errors look consistent with things like the > > backend that creates a table gets kille

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()

2008-05-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > It looks pretty good from here. I have an output of about 50 million > lines, and the only FATAL stuff is the "terminating due to admin > command". All other errors look consistent with things like the backend > that creates a table gets killed, so anybody trying to access

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()

2008-05-07 Thread Magnus Hagander
It looks pretty good from here. I have an output of about 50 million lines, and the only FATAL stuff is the "terminating due to admin command". All other errors look consistent with things like the backend that creates a table gets killed, so anybody trying to access that table later will fail with

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Testing pg_terminate_backend()

2008-05-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus, others, how is the SIGTERM testing going? --- Bruce Momjian wrote: > bruce wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >> The closest thing I can think of