Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] That dump-comments-on-composite-type-columns

2004-10-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I can do this, but I don't think I'll have time for the first beta. No problem. Another interesting think I noticed in pg_dump is dumping of LOBs. It seems to declare a cursor that fetches the blobs

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] That dump-comments-on-composite-type-columns patch...

2004-08-08 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I can do this, but I don't think I'll have time for the first beta. No problem. Another interesting think I noticed in pg_dump is dumping of LOBs. It seems to declare a cursor that fetches the blobs and then issues a fetch 1000 to get

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] That dump-comments-on-composite-type-columns patch...

2004-08-08 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another interesting think I noticed in pg_dump is dumping of LOBs. It seems to declare a cursor that fetches the blobs and then issues a fetch 1000 to get the first 1000 lobs. It never seems to execute any further fetches. Huh? That's

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] That dump-comments-on-composite-type-columns patch...

2004-08-08 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Another interesting think I noticed in pg_dump is dumping of LOBs. It seems to declare a cursor that fetches the blobs and then issues a fetch 1000 to get the first 1000 lobs. It never seems to execute any further fetches. Huh? That's inside a do-loop. Errr, yeah. Don't know what made me not