Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc.

2006-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Clarification, the attached version with the BORLAND adjustment is the one that was applied. --- Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Patch applied. Thanks. > >

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc.

2006-07-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Hiroshi Saito wrote: > Ooops, > I am uncertain at the reason for not knowing __BORLANDC__... > It will be sure if __BORLANDC__ has the definition. > Thanks. > > Regards, > Hiroshi Saito > > Fr

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc.

2006-07-14 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Ooops, I am uncertain at the reason for not knowing __BORLANDC__... It will be sure if __BORLANDC__ has the definition. Thanks. Regards, Hiroshi Saito From: "Tom Lane" "Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- src/include/c.h.orig Sat Jul 15 01:38:59 2006 +++ src/include/c.h Sat Jul

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc.

2006-07-14 Thread Tom Lane
"Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- src/include/c.h.orig Sat Jul 15 01:38:59 2006 > +++ src/include/c.h Sat Jul 15 01:40:04 2006 > @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ > #if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__) > #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER > #define errcode __vc_errcode > +#if (_MS