Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] plpython improvements

2006-08-18 Thread andrew
Tom Lane wrote: > Anyone in a position to review the pending plpython patch? > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00151.php > > After that little fiasco with plperl I'm disinclined to apply anything > without review by somebody who's pretty familiar with the PL in > question ..

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] plpython improvements

2006-08-18 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 04:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Anyone in a position to review the pending plpython patch? > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00151.php In several places the code does this: so = PyObject_Str(value); valuestr = PyString_AsString(so); We'

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] plpython improvements

2006-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Anyone in a position to review the pending plpython patch? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00151.php After that little fiasco with plperl I'm disinclined to apply anything without review by somebody who's pretty familiar with the PL in question ... and Python's not my langu