Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Oleg Bartunov
Grant, I'm originator of this thread and PostgreSQL is also a big user of the Snowball project, so we also are very interested in the vital activity of the project. However, I see issue with license, which is currently BSD and this allows us to use snowball in PostgreSQL (which is also BSD

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Richard Boulton
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD, no? (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just don't take credit for it. Everything I've read says the two are completely compatible

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Richard Boulton wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD, no? (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just don't take credit for it. Everything I've read says the two

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Grittner
Richard Boulton rich...@lemurconsulting.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD, no? (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just don't take credit for it.

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Apr 1, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: Grant, I'm originator of this thread and PostgreSQL is also a big user of the Snowball project, so we also are very interested in the vital activity of the project. However, I see issue with license, which is currently BSD and this allows us

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Guillaume Smet
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote: Where does GPL come into it?  (I hadn't seen that mentioned before for either product.) Richard is one of the developers of Snowball so he might want to keep its license compatible with GPL2. Moreover, Snowball

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes: Where does GPL come into it? (I hadn't seen that mentioned before for either product.) Keep in mind that you're seeing some fraction of the discussion on snowball-discuss (whatever is from people also subscribed to pgsql-hackers; everything

Re: [HACKERS] [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ?

2009-04-01 Thread Richard Boulton
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:41:53PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Richard Boulton wrote: As I understand it, ASL 2 is incompatible with GPL 2, at least according to the FSF. This would be a showstopper problem for me. Er, what does Postgres have that is covered by GPL2? I think cross posting