On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:12:20PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> This is pretty cool, IMO. Admittedly, it does seem hard to bottle it,
> but you managed it, so it's not completely impossible. What you could
> for this kind of thing is a series of patches and driver scripts, so
> you build PostgreSQ
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Tom Lane
>> To: Robert Haas
>> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:11:24 -0400
>> Subject: Re: 8.5 release timetable, again
>>
>> What I'd like to see is some sort of test mechanism for WAL recovery.
>>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Tom Lane
> To: Robert Haas
> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:11:24 -0400
> Subject: Re: 8.5 release timetable, again
>
> What I'd like to see is some sort of test mechanism for WAL recovery.
> What I've done sometimes in the past (and recently had to
Jeff Janes wrote:
> But the fact that a piece of code was executed doesn't mean
> it did the right thing. If it does something subtly wrong,
> will we notice?
That's why it takes some time to fashion a decent test.
On the other hand, if code is not being exercised at at all during the
beta
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Kevin Grittner"
> To: "Robert Haas" , "Bruce Momjian" <
> br...@momjian.us>
> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:07:05 -0500
> Subject: Re: 8.5 release timetable, again
> Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should be looking at an expanded test suite that
