On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:52:59PM +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Thinking a head (and maybe too far then we really need to at this
> point): So how will this work once they become "official". I assume
> Bruce's todo list would then link to the wiki and the editing would
> become more conserv
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:49:29PM +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
I agree pretty much. However I disagree that a wiki is not useful to
summarize discussion from the mailinglist. All that it needs is people
that are humble and do not push their own agendas. If nece
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:49:29PM +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> I agree pretty much. However I disagree that a wiki is not useful to
> summarize discussion from the mailinglist. All that it needs is people
> that are humble and do not push their own agendas. If necessary they
> should discu
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Well, of course, the internet is renowned for its preponderance of
people overburdened with humility and fairness. :-)
I think if you ask the php development team the chances are high that
they will agree that I have done exactly that for the PHP todo list.
Seriously, wh
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Being slightly more abstract, we are grappling with a couple of
different kinds of objects here: discussions and decisions. The mailing
list is a very good way of having a discussion, and a wiki is IMNSHO a
poor substitute. Ditto, bulletin board, web forum, blog . Th
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Gregory Stark wrote:
Josh Berkus writes:
I was actually hoping for more feedback on the content itself. I'm
still not clear if it's supposed to be "developers only - to the
exclusion of users" or "developers only - but accessable to anyone".
It should be readable by eve
