On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote:
> Amit Kapila writes:
>
>> Can you please try with the patch posted on hash index thread [1] to
>> see if you can reproduce any of these problems?
>>
>> [1] -
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1Kf6tOY0oVz_SEdngiNFkeXrA3xUSDP
Amit Kapila writes:
> Can you please try with the patch posted on hash index thread [1] to
> see if you can reproduce any of these problems?
>
> [1] -
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1Kf6tOY0oVz_SEdngiNFkeXrA3xUSDPPORQvsWVPdKqnA%40mail.gmail.com
I'm no longer seeing the failed asse
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote:
> Andreas Seltenreich writes:
>
>> Amit Kapila writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Seltenreich
>>> wrote:
Amit Kapila writes:
> [2. text/x-diff; fix_hash_bucketsplit_sqlsmith_v1.patch]
Ok, I'll do te
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote:
> Andreas Seltenreich writes:
>
>> Amit Kapila writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Seltenreich
>>> wrote:
Amit Kapila writes:
> [2. text/x-diff; fix_hash_bucketsplit_sqlsmith_v1.patch]
Ok, I'll do te
Andreas Seltenreich writes:
> Amit Kapila writes:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Seltenreich
>> wrote:
>>> Amit Kapila writes:
>>>
[2. text/x-diff; fix_hash_bucketsplit_sqlsmith_v1.patch]
>>> Ok, I'll do testing with the patch applied.
>
> Good news: the assertion hasn't fired