Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-07-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > 2011/7/5 Alvaro Herrera : >> Excerpts from Kohei Kaigai's message of mar jul 05 11:46:06 -0400 2011: >>> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera >>> > wrote: >>> > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 05 10:19:18 -0400 20

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-07-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Kohei Kaigai's message of mar jul 05 11:46:06 -0400 2011: > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera > > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 05 10:19:18 -0400 2011: > > > > > >> Hmm, OK.  I guess what I'm not sure about is - how much should we > > >>

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-07-05 Thread Kohei Kaigai
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 05 10:19:18 -0400 2011: > > > >> Hmm, OK.  I guess what I'm not sure about is - how much should we > >> worry about the fact that this creates several more shared (and > >> therefore naile

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-07-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 05 10:19:18 -0400 2011: > >> Hmm, OK.  I guess what I'm not sure about is - how much should we >> worry about the fact that this creates several more shared (and >> therefore nailed?) system cat

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-07-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar jul 05 10:19:18 -0400 2011: > Hmm, OK. I guess what I'm not sure about is - how much should we > worry about the fact that this creates several more shared (and > therefore nailed?) system catalogs? Anyone have an opinion on that? "Several"? That woul

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-07-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > 2011/6/13 Robert Haas : >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: >>> 2011/6/13 Robert Haas : On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > The attached patch is an update revision of security label support >

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-06-13 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2011/6/13 Robert Haas : > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: >> 2011/6/13 Robert Haas : >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: The attached patch is an update revision of security label support for shared database objects. >>> >>> I'm kind of unexcit

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > 2011/6/13 Robert Haas : >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: >>> The attached patch is an update revision of security label support >>> for shared database objects. >> >> I'm kind of unexcited about this whole idea.  Addin

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-06-13 Thread Kohei KaiGai
2011/6/13 Robert Haas : > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: >> The attached patch is an update revision of security label support >> for shared database objects. > > I'm kind of unexcited about this whole idea.  Adding a shared catalog > for a feature that's only of interest to

Re: [HACKERS] [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object

2011-06-13 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai wrote: > The attached patch is an update revision of security label support > for shared database objects. I'm kind of unexcited about this whole idea. Adding a shared catalog for a feature that's only of interest to a small percentage of our user p