Jim Nasby wrote:
On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jan 26, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
"Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pi
On 2/6/07, Jim Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
>> Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
>>> "Allow a warm standby syst
On Feb 5, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jan 26, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
"Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements
[pitr]
No, it's a
Gregory Stark wrote:
"Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
"Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
This is useful for checking PITR recovery."
No, nobody worked on it prior to 8.2. Afaik there's
Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jan 26, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
"Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
No, it's a someday-wishlist item; the work
Tom Lane wrote:
Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
"Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
No, it's a someday-wishlist item; the work involved is not small.
Thanks,very much for the info. I'm
On Jan 26, 2:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
> Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
> > "Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
>
> No, it's a someday-wishlist item; the work involved is
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 12:44:51PM -0800, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> >Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> >>Henry B. Hotz: GSSAPI authentication method for C (FE/BE) and
> >>Java (FE).
> >>Magnus Haglander: SSPI (GSSAPI compatible) authentication metho
On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
Henry B. Hotz: GSSAPI authentication method for C (FE/BE) and
Java (FE).
Magnus Haglander: SSPI (GSSAPI compatible) authentication method
for C
(FE) on Windows.
(That fair Magnus? Or you want to volunteer for BE su
Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> Henry B. Hotz: GSSAPI authentication method for C (FE/BE) and Java (FE).
> Magnus Haglander: SSPI (GSSAPI compatible) authentication method for C
> (FE) on Windows.
>
> (That fair Magnus? Or you want to volunteer for BE support as well?)
Seems fair and about what we discu
Sent directly. Anyone else who's interested can have a copy. Just
email me.
I *think* it's structurally sound. Please tell me if you find a
problem. It lacks a lot: proper specification of required security
properties, a way to specify different mechanism lists for local,
vice TCP, v
* Henry B. Hotz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If anyone is interested I currently have working-but-incomplete
> patches to support SASL in C. I've decided not to finish and submit
> them because the glue code to make configuration reasonable, and to
> allow use of existing Postgres password d
"Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
>
> "Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
> This is useful for checking PITR recovery."
No, nobody worked on it prior to 8.2. Afaik there's still nobody work
"Rick Gigger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
>
> "Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
> This is useful for checking PITR recovery."
No, nobody worked on it prior to 8.2. Afaik there's still nobody work
Henry B. Hotz: GSSAPI authentication method for C (FE/BE) and Java
(FE).
Magnus Haglander: SSPI (GSSAPI compatible) authentication method for
C (FE) on Windows.
(That fair Magnus? Or you want to volunteer for BE support as well?)
GSSAPI isn't much more than a functional replacement for Ker
Rick Gigger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
> "Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
No, it's a someday-wishlist item; the work involved is not small.
regards, tom lane
--
I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
"Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
This is useful for checking PITR recovery."
I assume it's not on this list either because it is already complete and
slated for 8.3, or it is going to take too l
On 1/22/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or so... :)
Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
Alvaro Herrera: Autovacuum improvements (maintenance window etc..)
Gavin Sherry: Bitmap Indexes (on disk), possible basic Window functions
Jonah Harris
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Or so... :)
>>
>> I am sure there are more, the ones with question marks are unknowns but
>> heard of in the ether somewhere. Any additions or confirmations?
>>
>>
> I have the first phase of Frequent Update Optimi
I would like to suggest patches for OR-clause optimization and using index for
searching NULLs.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
---(end of broadcas
Hello
Pavel Stehule: PLpsm
I expect so plpgpsm will be some time (+/- one year) external project. For
8.3 I would to put 2 patches: scrollable cursors and trappable warnings
(maybe not). I have patch for plpgsql for scrollable cursors too. No body
here has experience with SQL/PSM and plpgps
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:14:01PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
>
> Another thing which was mentioned previously which I'd really like to
> see happen (and was discussed o
On 1/23/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or so... :)
I am sure there are more, the ones with question marks are unknowns but
heard of in the ether somewhere. Any additions or confirmations?
I have the first phase of Frequent Update Optimizations (HOT) patch ready.
But I held it
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Or so... :)
Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
Alvaro Herrera: Autovacuum improvements (maintenance window etc..)
Gavin Sherry: Bitmap Indexes (on disk), possible basic Window functions
Gavin: how's it going with the bitmap inde
* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
Another thing which was mentioned previously which I'd really like to
see happen (and was discussed on the list...) is replacing the Kerberos
support with GSSAPI support and
* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
It seems unlikely that I'm going to have time at the rate things are
going but I was hoping to take a whack at default permissions/ownership
by schema. Kind of a umask-type
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
>
> Alvaro Herrera: Autovacuum improvements (maintenance window etc..)
> Gavin Sherry: Bitmap Indexes (on disk), possible basic Window functions
> Jonah Harris: WITH/Recurs
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 14:16 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I am sure there are more, the ones with question marks are unknowns but
> heard of in the ether somewhere. Any additions or confirmations?
>
I'd still like to make an attempt at my Synchronized Scanning patch.
If freeze is 10 weeks away
> Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
>
> Alvaro Herrera: Autovacuum improvements (maintenance window etc..)
> Gavin Sherry: Bitmap Indexes (on disk), possible basic Window functions
> Jonah Harris: WITH/Recursive Queries?
> Andrei Kovalesvki: Some Win32
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Or so... :)
Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
Alvaro Herrera: Autovacuum improvements (maintenance window etc..)
Gavin Sherry: Bitmap Indexes (on disk), possible basic Window functions
Jonah Harris: WITH/Rec
On 1/22/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonah Harris: WITH/Recursive Queries?
Yup, just talked with Bruce about this last week. Working on the design now.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation| fax: 732.331.1301
33 Woo
Or so... :)
Thought I would do a poll of what is happening in the world for 8.3. I have:
Alvaro Herrera: Autovacuum improvements (maintenance window etc..)
Gavin Sherry: Bitmap Indexes (on disk), possible basic Window functions
Jonah Harris: WITH/Recursive Queries?
Andrei Kovalesvki: Some Win32 w
32 matches
Mail list logo
