Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-10-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added this to backend/libpq/README.SSL to be integrated into our main docs later. --- Bear Giles wrote: > A second cut at SSL documentation > > > > SSL Support in PostgreSQL > = > > Wh

Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-08-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
With Bear disappearing, I am now unsure of our current SSL code. He submitted a bunch of patches that seemed to improve our SSL capabilities, but I am unsure if it is done, and exactly how it was improved. Attached is the documentation Bear supplied. I have removed the interfaces/ssl directory

Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-05-22 Thread Nigel J. Andrews
> On Tue, 21 May 2002 14:27:00 -0600 (MDT) > "Bear Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A second cut at SSL documentation > [snip] > > To set up a SSH/OpenSSH tunnel, a shell account for each > > user should be set up on the database server. It is acceptable > > for the shell program to b

Re: [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-05-21 Thread Neil Conway
On Tue, 21 May 2002 14:27:00 -0600 (MDT) "Bear Giles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A second cut at SSL documentation I've pointed out some minor things I noticed while reading through. Yeah, I was bored :-) > The sites that require SSL fall into one (or more) of several broad > categories. >

[HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation

2002-05-21 Thread Bear Giles
A second cut at SSL documentation SSL Support in PostgreSQL = Who needs it? = The sites that require SSL fall into one (or more) of several broad categories. *) They have insecure networks. Examples of insecure networks are anyone in a "corporate