Any change of getting a 7.1 RC1 RPM? I'm using the beta4 RPMs at the moment
but don't seem to be any more recent ones.
It would seem dangerous to me to produce a 7.1 RPM without testing the RPM
build process?
-mike
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
Any change of getting a 7.1 RC1 RPM? I'm using the beta4 RPMs at the moment
but don't seem to be any more recent ones.
I'm building a quickie RC1-1 RPM right now. There are some other things
I need to do on the RPMset before final release -- and I plan on working
Lamar Owen wrote:
Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
Any change of getting a 7.1 RC1 RPM? I'm using the beta4 RPMs at the moment
but don't seem to be any more recent ones.
I'm building a quickie RC1-1 RPM right now. There are some other things
I need to do on the RPMset before final release
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BIG NOTE: These are built on Red Hat _7.0_ NOT 6.2 as previous ones
have been. The ODBC client build on 6.2 has been broken -- it built at
beta4, but now gives this error set at beta6/RC1:
ar crs libpsqlodbc.a info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o
Lamar Owen wrote:
Well, in any case, preliminary 7.1RC1 RPMS are up. There are some odd
issues with the packaging that I am working on. Be sure to read
README.rpm-dist -- attached to this message for your convenience.
Forgot to attach the file. :-(.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter
Tom Lane wrote:
It would appear you have a conflict about whether MULTIBYTE is defined
or not --- the code thinks so, but the makefile does not, since
multibyte.o is not seen in the link command.
The identical technique is used in libpq's makefile, so I'm not sure
why you do not see a link
