PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.2 items
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which
o
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones
> people were thinking about for 7.2?
A friend of mine wants to use PostgreSQL instead of Oracle for a large
application, but has run into a snag when speed comparisons looked
good unt
Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 08:00:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There is a BSD-license gettext clone project, but it doesn't look to be
>> very far along.
> What's missing with it?
Where did you find an actual release meant for public consumption?
I had
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:36:56PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Patrick Welche writes:
>
> > > I have no objection to the gettext API, but I was and still am concerned
> > > about depending on GNU gettext's code, because of license conflicts.
> > > There is a BSD-license gettext clone project
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 08:00:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Translation: If we want to use gettext I can get started. I don't
> > think I'm interested in using any other interface.
>
> I have no objection to the gettext API, but I was and sti
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:21:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Peter E. had implied that he wanted to tackle the elog issues for 7.2,
> > but I'm not sure if he's committed to it or not.
>
> Well...
>
> * Automatically add filename, line, function name: Easy to code
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Translation: If we want to use gettext I can get started. I don't
> think I'm interested in using any other interface.
I have no objection to the gettext API, but I was and still am concerned
about depending on GNU gettext's code, because of li
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:41:57 +1200
>
> > Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones
> > people were thinking about for 7.2?
>
> The need for stored procedures that return a record set.
> This is required to migrate from MSSQL, Interbase a
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones
> people were thinking about for 7.2?
Peter E. had implied that he wanted to tackle the elog issues for 7.2,
but I'm not sure if he's committed to it or not.
I am wanting to see SQL sc
> Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones
> people were thinking about for 7.2?
The need for stored procedures that return a record set.
This is required to migrate from MSSQL, Interbase and others.
This is a commonly requested item.
Nested Transactions. This allow
10 matches
Mail list logo
