Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:22:38PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > But the source distribution hasn't *got* any binary files. > > There are some under doc/src/graphics, and then there are > doc/postgres.tar.gz and doc/man.tar.gz. And what about publishing xdelta patches?

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > But the source distribution hasn't *got* any binary files. There are some under doc/src/graphics, and then there are doc/postgres.tar.gz and doc/man.tar.gz. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Yury Bokhoncovich
Hello! On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > In some releases, it is possible, in others we add/remove files and it > isn't possible. I think because it isn't always possible we normally > don't do it. I think it's enough to do diffs for minor release (i.e. 7.2.2->7.2.3, 7.3.0->7.3.1 and

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Adding or removing files isn't the problem (see -N option). Binary files > >> are the problem. > > > Do we change any binary files in minor releases, or even major ones? > > But the source distribution

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Adding or removing files isn't the problem (see -N option). Binary files >> are the problem. > Do we change any binary files in minor releases, or even major ones? But the source distribution hasn't *got* any binary files.

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > BTW, is it possible to have just patch against previous version (to reduce > > > traffic and CPU)? I.e. something like 7.2.2-7.2.3.diff.gz? > > > > In some releases, it is possible, in others we add/remove files and it > > isn't possible. I

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > > BTW, is it possible to have just patch against previous version (to reduce > > traffic and CPU)? I.e. something like 7.2.2-7.2.3.diff.gz? > > In some releases, it is possible, in others we add/remove files and it > isn't possible. I think because it isn't always possibl

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Yury Bokhoncovich wrote: > Hello! > > BTW, is it possible to have just patch against previous version (to reduce > traffic and CPU)? I.e. something like 7.2.2-7.2.3.diff.gz? In some releases, it is possible, in others we add/remove files and it isn't possible. I think because it isn't always p

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-10-01 Thread Yury Bokhoncovich
Hello! BTW, is it possible to have just patch against previous version (to reduce traffic and CPU)? I.e. something like 7.2.2-7.2.3.diff.gz? -- WBR, Yury Bokhoncovich, Senior System Administrator, NOC of F1 Group. Phone: +7 (3832) 106228, ext.140, E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix is like a wigwa

Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-09-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, 7.2.3 is all branded and ready to go. HISTORY/release.sgml shows: --- Release Notes Release 7.2.3 Release date: 2002-10-01 This has a varie

[HACKERS] 7.2.3 patching done

2002-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
I'm done making back-patches for 7.2.3. Over to you, Bruce ... attached is the REL7_2_STABLE branch history since 7.2.2. regards, tom lane 2002-09-30 16:57 tgl * src/backend/utils/adt/: date.c, datetime.c (REL7_2_STABLE): Back-patch fixes to work around