Lamar Owen writes:
> Attempting to build an initial RPMset here Will upload when I get a good
> build -- although I may have to release without the contrib tree packaged,
> due to build errors.
Did you get all the patches I sent you? These should have the contrib
tree covered. If you plan
Hannu Krosing writes:
> You could also consider the above as an IQ test ;)
The only problem is that computers have been shown to have an IQ of zero.
> I suggest that you do a writeup of yours, enumerating the rules for
> both internal (code and CVS tags) and external development, alpha,
> beta
Is there some formal place to make comments on how 7.2b1 works? I'm about
to run it through it's paces on OBSD. Or is this just a 'it's broked'
testing time?
- Brandon
c: 646-456-5455
> ...
> > If you come up with something that all thinkers can agree, I'm sure it
> > will be used from now on.
>
> I *think* that somewhere there is a list of "things to do" to prepare a
> release. If that isn't in the sgml doc set, it should be. And if it
> doesn't mention the naming convention
On Thursday 25 October 2001 12:48 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> ... is now packaged ... mirrors will pick it up soon, but if anyone wants
> to do a quick check, its in /pub/beta ...
Attempting to build an initial RPMset here Will upload when I get a good
build -- although I may have to relea
...
> If you come up with something that all thinkers can agree, I'm sure it
> will be used from now on.
I *think* that somewhere there is a list of "things to do" to prepare a
release. If that isn't in the sgml doc set, it should be. And if it
doesn't mention the naming convention for beta and r
On Friday 26 October 2001 04:14 pm, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> And in linux kernel tradition there would be no non-beta 7.3 and the
> beta
> for 7.2 would be 7.1.299 or something, and there would also be numerous
> "brown paper bag" releases ;)
We have had our share of 'brown paper bag' releases, too
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > CVS tags have been conssitent since v7.1 ...
>
> Allow me to consider that a joke:
>
> REL7_2_BETA1
> REL7_1_STABLE
> REL7_1_BETA3
> REL7_1_BETA2
> REL7_1_BETA
> REL7_1_2
> REL7_1
>
> So,
>
> Where is REL7_1_1? Where is REL7_1_BETA1
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> CVS tags have been conssitent since v7.1 ...
Allow me to consider that a joke:
REL7_2_BETA1
REL7_1_STABLE
REL7_1_BETA3
REL7_1_BETA2
REL7_1_BETA
REL7_1_2
REL7_1
So,
Where is REL7_1_1? Where is REL7_1_BETA1? What does REL7_1_BETA belong
to? What ever happened to be
CVS tags have been conssitent since v7.1 ...
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > ... is now packaged ... mirrors will pick it up soon, but if anyone wants
> > to do a quick check, its in /pub/beta ...
>
> What ever happened to 7.2beta1?
>
> Sorry, but
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> ... is now packaged ... mirrors will pick it up soon, but if anyone wants
> to do a quick check, its in /pub/beta ...
What ever happened to 7.2beta1?
Sorry, but the inconsistency in naming of releases and CVS tags (if ever
there would be any) is driving me nuts.
--
... is now packaged ... mirrors will pick it up soon, but if anyone wants
to do a quick check, its in /pub/beta ...
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
