Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 branding

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
On Thursday 04 March 2004 12:04 am, Tom Lane wrote: > I thought we'd fixed that problem already though. Is there another? Don't know if it's another, but the problem posted by Cott Lang on 1/17 ( http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-01/msg00111.php ) has not been resolved. pg_autovacu

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 branding

2004-03-03 Thread Tom Lane
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ack is it too late to submit a patch to fix the int overflow > problem with pg_autovacuum? No; we're not planning to wrap 7.4.2 till (probably) Sunday. If you can get the patch in within the next day or so, we can include it. I thought we'd

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 branding

2004-03-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now. Just as a reminder, before ppl panic ... we are aiming for Monday for a 7.4.2 release ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EM

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 branding

2004-03-03 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:11 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now. Ack is it too late to submit a patch to fix the int overflow problem with pg_autovacuum? I'll send a patch to the patches list shortly, hopefully it will get in

[HACKERS] 7.4.2 branding

2004-03-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newto