On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Don't know if it's bad, but make check reports a regression failure on
> > join.
>
> I believe we'd determined that this is an acceptable platform-specific
> behavior.
Yep. Due to the new qsort() in 713UP3.
LER
>
>
Thansk Tom,
I had vague memory about that :)
Better check he?
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:35:07 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Don't know if it's bad, but make check reports a regression failure on
> join.
I believe we'd determined that this is an acceptable platform-specific
behavior.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)-
Hi,
Don't know if it's bad, but make check reports a regression failure on
join.
Here's the regression.diffs
*** ./expected/join.out Thu Sep 25 08:58:06 2003
--- ./results/join.out Tue Nov 25 23:46:27 2003
***
*** 1732,1739
| 6 | 6 | six |
| 7 | 7 | seven |
