Matt Miller írta:
The [pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch] patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball ...
However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0.
I've been told that the pgcluster patch patches some generated files
(parse.h and other apparently).
Yes, I could not at first apply to
"Matt Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I could not at first apply to REL8_2_0 because the patch file
> wanted to patch src/backend/parser/gram.c. At that point I started over
> with a fresh REL8_2_0, ran "./configure; make", and tried the patch
> again. That's when I got a bunch of fail
> > The [pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch] patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball ...
> > However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0.
>
> I've been told that the pgcluster patch patches some generated files
> (parse.h and other apparently).
Yes, I could not at first apply to REL8_2_0 because the
Matt Miller wrote:
difference between REL8_2_STABLE, REL8_2_0
STABLE doesn't mean static. It's the branch for what will be the
8.1.x series.
Okay, and this is all different from HEAD, which will presumably become
8.3, correct?
Yes. Of course, I should have said 8.2.x above.
c
> > difference between REL8_2_STABLE, REL8_2_0
>
> STABLE doesn't mean static. It's the branch for what will be the
> 8.1.x series.
Okay, and this is all different from HEAD, which will presumably become
8.3, correct?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9:
Matt Miller wrote:
> However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all
> raises the question: what's the difference between REL8_2_STABLE,
> REL8_2_0, and the 8.2.0 tarball?
REL8_2_0 is the tag from with the 8.2.0 tarball was built.
REL8_2_STABLE is the branch that, having star
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matt Miller wrote:
>> However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all
>> raises the question: what's the difference between REL8_2_STABLE,
>> REL8_2_0, and the 8.2.0 tarball?
> STABLE doesn't mean static. It's the branch for what wil
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Matt Miller wrote:
> >>When I apply pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch to Postgres REL8_2_STABLE I get
> >>a handful of rejects.
> >
> >The patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball without rejects and without
> >fuzz. That's good. Now on to some fun with pgcluster...
> >
> >However, the p
Matt Miller wrote:
When I apply pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch to Postgres REL8_2_STABLE I get
a handful of rejects.
The patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball without rejects and without
fuzz. That's good. Now on to some fun with pgcluster...
However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_
> When I apply pgcluster-1.7.0rc1-patch to Postgres REL8_2_STABLE I get
> a handful of rejects.
The patch applies to the 8.2.0 tarball without rejects and without
fuzz. That's good. Now on to some fun with pgcluster...
However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all
raises t
10 matches
Mail list logo
