Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-08-06 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 09:25, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:13, Kevin Field wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:30, Kevin Field >>> wrote: >>> >> > The event viewer says: >>> >> > >>> >> > The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( PostgreSQL ) >>> > > > cannot >>> >> > be

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-08-06 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:13, Kevin Field wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:30, Kevin Field >> wrote: >> >> > The event viewer says: >> >> > >> >> > The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( PostgreSQL ) >> > > > cannot >> >> > be >> >> > found. The local computer may not have the necessary

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-08-05 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:13, Kevin Field wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:30, Kevin Field >> wrote: >> >> > The event viewer says: >> >> > >> >> > The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( PostgreSQL ) >> > > > cannot >> >> > be >> >> > found. The local computer may not have the necessary

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-08-04 Thread Kevin Field
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:30, Kevin Field > wrote: > >> > The event viewer says: > >> > > >> > The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( PostgreSQL ) > > > > cannot > >> > be > >> > found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry > >> > information or message DLL files to dis

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-08-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:30, Kevin Field wrote: >> > The event viewer says: >> > >> > The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( PostgreSQL ) cannot >> > be >> > found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry >> > information or message DLL files to display messages from a remot

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-08-01 Thread Kevin Field
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 19:29, Kevin Field > wrote: > >>     > %t LOG:  received fast shutdown request > >>     > %t LOG:  aborting any active transactions > >>     > %t LOG:  autovacuum launcher shutting down > >>     > %t LOG:  shutting down > >>     > %t LOG:  database system is shut down > >>

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-31 Thread Kevin Field
> > %t LOG: received fast shutdown request > > %t LOG: aborting any active transactions > > %t LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down > > %t LOG: shutting down > > %t LOG: database system is shut down > > > > That's the entire file. Attempting to start the service,

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-31 Thread Kevin Field
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 19:52, Kevin Field > wrote: > > On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the > > patch.  In the log, I get: > > > > %t LOG:  CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was > > interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall. > > Now, that's just str

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-31 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 19:29, Kevin Field wrote: >>     > %t LOG:  received fast shutdown request >>     > %t LOG:  aborting any active transactions >>     > %t LOG:  autovacuum launcher shutting down >>     > %t LOG:  shutting down >>     > %t LOG:  database system is shut down >>     > >>     >

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-31 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 14:41, Kevin Field wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 19:52, Kevin Field >> wrote: >> > On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the >> > patch.  In the log, I get: >> > >> > %t LOG:  CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was >> > interrupted by

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 19:52, Kevin Field wrote: > On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the > patch.  In the log, I get: > > %t LOG:  CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was > interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall. Now, that's just strange :-O First o

Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-29 Thread Kevin Field
> I put the old binary back and it works fine. For the record, "fine" meaning I've never had the shared memory problem. Kev -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] 8.4 win32 shared memory patch

2009-07-29 Thread Kevin Field
On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the patch. In the log, I get: %t LOG: CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall. (error code 2) %t LOG: could not fork autovacuum worker process: A blocking operation