On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I think this is due to a change that was made in 8.2:
Cool. Thanks for the followup!
eric
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Eric B. Ridge e...@tcdi.com writes:
I loaded a copy of a production database into PG 8.4b1 and immediately
saw that all of our queries were significantly slower compared to v8.1.
Some investigation showed that the use of non-IMMUTABLE PL/PGSQL
functions as view columns, when these views
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
Some investigation showed that the use of non-IMMUTABLE PL/PGSQL
functions as view columns, when these views are joined with other
views, cause the query to be planned poorly.
I'm sorry. I should have said VOLATILE functions. Which is the
I loaded a copy of a production database into PG 8.4b1 and immediately
saw that all of our queries were significantly slower compared to v8.1.
Some investigation showed that the use of non-IMMUTABLE PL/PGSQL
functions as view columns, when these views are joined with other
views, cause the
