On 2015/12/23 8:45, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> In my opinion a term more closely coupled to the concrete syntax would
>> be easier to understand. I have no objection to referring to the
>> *process* of trying to deduce a suitable index from the
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> In my opinion a term more closely coupled to the concrete syntax would
> be easier to understand. I have no objection to referring to the
> *process* of trying to deduce a suitable index from the ON CONFLICT
> clause as "inference". But calli
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> If it's an axiom that there is nothing wrong with the term inference,
>> then obviously we should not change anything. But that seems to me to
>> be putting the cart before the horse.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> If it's an axiom that there is nothing wrong with the term inference,
> then obviously we should not change anything. But that seems to me to
> be putting the cart before the horse.
OK, then. What's wrong with the term inference?
--
Peter G
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> TBH I'm kinda inclined to sort this out by removing all usage of the
>>> word "inference" everywhere --- error messages and code comments and
>>> documentation wording, and replace i
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> TBH I'm kinda inclined to sort this out by removing all usage of the
>> word "inference" everywhere --- error messages and code comments and
>> documentation wording, and replace it with some other wording as
>> appropriate for each context.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas
>> > wrote:
>> >> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good
>> >> terminology, but what'
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good
> >> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong.
> >
> > It doesn't appear in the do
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good
>> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong.
>
> It doesn't appear in the documentation. The term "inferenc
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good
> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong.
It doesn't appear in the documentation. The term "inference
specification" only appears where it's necessary to precisely
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-12-18 13:50:34 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Tatsuro Yamada
>> wrote:
>> > I found typos in privileges.sql and privileges.out
>> > Please find attached a patch.
>>
>> Thanks, good catch. But even asi
On 2015-12-18 13:50:34 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Tatsuro Yamada
> wrote:
> > I found typos in privileges.sql and privileges.out
> > Please find attached a patch.
>
> Thanks, good catch. But even aside from this particular issue, isn't
> that comment in need of
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Tatsuro Yamada
wrote:
> I found typos in privileges.sql and privileges.out
> Please find attached a patch.
Thanks, good catch. But even aside from this particular issue, isn't
that comment in need of a little more love? An inference means a
deduction, or someth
Hi,
This is my first post to -hackers.
I found typos in privileges.sql and privileges.out
Please find attached a patch.
Best regards,
Tatsuro Yamada
*** a/src/test/regress/expected/privileges.out
--- b/src/test/regress/expected/privileges.out
***
*** 390,396 INSERT INTO atest5(
14 matches
Mail list logo
