Thanks, done.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> TODO has an entry
>
> o Allow UPDATE to handle complex aggregates [update]?
>
> which I think is now obsolete, because we've settled on rejecting
> aggregates at the top level of U
TODO has an entry
o Allow UPDATE to handle complex aggregates [update]?
which I think is now obsolete, because we've settled on rejecting
aggregates at the top level of UPDATE, as the spec tells us to do.
Also, there's one remaining unfinished feature in the multi-argument
aggregate patc