I was thinking about the proposals that have been made a couple of times
to offer a variant of VACUUM that works by table-rewriting (ie, same as
CLUSTER except for not sorting the rows). I thought I'd do some
experimentation to see what a reasonable syntax for it would be.
I soon convinced
Tom Lane wrote:
maybe it
is time to bite the bullet and clean up VACUUM's syntax so that new
modifiers can be added without making them reserved words. The first
idea that comes to mind is something like
VACUUM [tablename] [ WITH REPLACE, VERBOSE [, ...] ]
I'd be OK with putting
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
maybe it
is time to bite the bullet and clean up VACUUM's syntax so that new
modifiers can be added without making them reserved words. The first
idea that comes to mind is something like
I'd be OK with putting the options at the
