Robert Haas wrote:
2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z dev...@gunduz.org:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
people who had already modified their
2010/10/14 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Robert Haas wrote:
2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z dev...@gunduz.org:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
Robert Haas wrote:
2010/10/14 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us:
Robert Haas wrote:
2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z dev...@gunduz.org:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
I was wondering if it would cause package
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org,
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the
master branch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB:
Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit :
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the
master branch.
+1
2010/9/27 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info:
Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit :
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
I'm not sure this is worth back-patching,
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
people who had already modified their postgresql.conf.
We don't overwrite .conf files during upgrades.
--
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
people who had already modified their postgresql.conf.
We don't
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun sep 27 09:45:57 -0400 2010:
(Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.)
Did you use git cherry-pick?
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom
2010/9/27 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com:
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun sep 27 09:45:57 -0400 2010:
(Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.)
Did you use git cherry-pick?
Yes!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres
11 matches
Mail list logo