Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas wrote: 2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z dev...@gunduz.org: On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it. I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for people who had already modified their

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-10-14 Thread Robert Haas
2010/10/14 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us: Robert Haas wrote: 2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z dev...@gunduz.org: On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it. I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Haas wrote: 2010/10/14 Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us: Robert Haas wrote: 2010/9/27 Devrim G?ND?Z dev...@gunduz.org: On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it. I was wondering if it would cause package

[HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that require restart. Applicable for 9.0+. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org,

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Robert Haas
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that require restart. Applicable for 9.0+. I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the master branch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB:

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Guillaume Lelarge
Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit : 2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that require restart. Applicable for 9.0+. I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the master branch. +1

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Robert Haas
2010/9/27 Guillaume Lelarge guilla...@lelarge.info: Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit : 2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that require restart. Applicable for 9.0+. I'm not sure this is worth back-patching,

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it. I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for people who had already modified their postgresql.conf. We don't overwrite .conf files during upgrades. --

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Robert Haas
2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it. I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for people who had already modified their postgresql.conf. We don't

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun sep 27 09:45:57 -0400 2010: (Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.) Did you use git cherry-pick? -- Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom

Re: [HACKERS] A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

2010-09-27 Thread Robert Haas
2010/9/27 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com: Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun sep 27 09:45:57 -0400 2010: (Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.) Did you use git cherry-pick? Yes! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres