Tom Lane wrote:
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Would you try the patch proposed at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00299.php
Works fine on Tru64 UNIX 4.0D and 5.1.
OK,
Tom Lane wrote:
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:56:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Hmm, where is it then?
getaddrinfo is a macro in netdb.h:
Yes, we know that. The question was where does the macro point.
The solution is to either revert to the 8.1.1
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
This test is different, it checks that getaddrinfo has four args.
If it doesn't, we don't wanna use it anyway ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The solution is to either revert to the 8.1.1 code (my recommendation)
or check for ngetaddrinfo. The latter is a crude hack though.
Hm, I think both of us are confused: me because I thought
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Would you try the patch proposed at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00299.php
Works fine on Tru64 UNIX 4.0D and 5.1.
OK, applied to HEAD and 8.1. I'm feeling a bit of
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) won't correctly detect getaddrinfo on
Tru64 UNIX because the function doesn't exist under that name in libc.
From netdb.h:
#if defined (_SOCKADDR_LEN) || defined (_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED)
#define getaddrinfo ngetaddrinfo
#else
#define getaddrinfo ogetaddrinfo
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) won't correctly detect getaddrinfo on
Tru64 UNIX because the function doesn't exist under that name in libc.
We changed that code specifically so it *would* work on Tru64 --- see
this thread:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:02:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) won't correctly detect getaddrinfo on
Tru64 UNIX because the function doesn't exist under that name in libc.
We changed that code specifically so it *would* work
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:02:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
We changed that code specifically so it *would* work on Tru64 --- see
this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-01/msg00511.php
From my reading, no completed patch was posted
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:56:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) will not detect getaddrinfo() on Tru64
UNIX because getaddrinfo is not in libc.
Hmm, where is it then?
getaddrinfo is a macro in netdb.h:
#if defined
Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 09:56:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Hmm, where is it then?
getaddrinfo is a macro in netdb.h:
Yes, we know that. The question was where does the macro point.
The solution is to either revert to the 8.1.1 code (my recommendation)
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Would you try the patch proposed at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00299.php
and see if it fixes the problem? That patch has *not* gotten applied,
probably because no one confirmed that it worked.
This test is
12 matches
Mail list logo
