How can it recurse, actually - there won't be an index with the same name
in the subtable?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:21:16AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it
> > isn'
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:21:16AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it
> isn't documented if it is?? I guess it's not really relevant is it?
Oh, sorry, the command does not recurse. Should it? The whole CLUSTER
thin
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:54:24AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I just managed to break the CLUSTER ON patch:
Damn... I dunno how I managed to miss this. Please apply the attached
patch.
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
Licensee shall have no right to use the Licensed Software
for productive or
I just managed to break the CLUSTER ON patch:
test=# create table test (a int4 primary key, b int4 unique, c int4);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index 'test_pkey'
for table 'test'
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / UNIQUE will create implicit index 'test_b_key' for
table 'test'
NO
Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it
isn't documented if it is?? I guess it's not really relevant is it?
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster