On 26 October 2015 at 00:59, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/HEAD/PORTING.md
> Looking at the porting section many routines have changed compared to
> OpenSSL. I can't imagine this fork to become a complete replacement of
> OpenSSL, but it may be worth cons
Hi all,
Perhaps some of you guys knew about that, but I just found about this
stuff this morning:
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/HEAD/PORTING.md
Looking at the porting section many routines have changed compared to
OpenSSL. I can't imagine this fork to become a complete replacement
