[HACKERS] About varlena2

2005-12-05 Thread Qingqing Zhou
To reduce size of varlen2.vl_len to int16. This has been mentioned before, but is there any show-stopper reasoning preventing us from doing that or somebody has been working on it? Sorry, just to repeat myself. Char types will benefit from that. Many applications are from DB2, Oracle or SQL

Re: [HACKERS] About varlena2

2005-12-05 Thread Tom Lane
Qingqing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To reduce size of varlen2.vl_len to int16. This has been mentioned before, but is there any show-stopper reasoning preventing us from doing that or somebody has been working on it? Sorry, just to repeat myself. Char types will benefit from that. I have

Re: [HACKERS] About varlena2

2005-12-05 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
Qingqing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To reduce size of varlen2.vl_len to int16. This has been mentioned before, but is there any show-stopper reasoning preventing us from doing that or somebody has been working on it? Hi, I'm rewriting the patch that I proposed before.