Re: [HACKERS] Add tests for LOCK TABLE

2013-07-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Robins Tharakan wrote: > Updated the patch: > - Updated ROLEs as per Robert's feedback You managed to use a naming convention different from the one that you used before. Before, you had regress_rol_op1; here, you've got regress_lock_rol1. Consistency may be the

Re: [HACKERS] Add tests for LOCK TABLE

2013-07-07 Thread Robins Tharakan
On 23 May 2013 18:19, Robins Tharakan wrote: > Please find attached a patch to take code-coverage of LOCK TABLE ( > src/backend/commands/lockcmds.c) from 57% to 84%. Updated the patch: - Updated ROLEs as per Robert's feedback - Added test to serial_schedule. -- Robins Tharakan regress_lock_v

[HACKERS] Add tests for LOCK TABLE

2013-05-23 Thread Robins Tharakan
Hi, Please find attached a patch to take code-coverage of LOCK TABLE ( src/backend/commands/lockcmds.c) from 57% to 84%. Any and all feedback is welcome. -- Robins Tharakan regress_lock.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To mak