I will clean it up before applying.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
Hi again,
Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.
I improved the patch now to only ignore TABLE DATA
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Pitt [2006-02-19 14:39 +0100]:
Since this changes the behaviour of pg_restore, this should probably
become an option, e. g. -D / --ignore-existing-table-data. I'll do
this if you agree to the principle of the current patch.
I improved the patch
Hi again,
Tom Lane [2006-02-18 14:34 -0500]:
The core problem is that we want to not restore objects (mainly
tables) in the destination database which already exist.
Why is this a problem? It's already the default behavior --- the
creation commands fail but pg_restore keeps going.
Hi again,
Meh, the list server didn't like the attached test script, so I put it
here:
http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/test-pg_restore-existing.sh
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
In a world
