Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Right now, you might well care about whether a feature arrived in 9.3 vs > 9.4, for instance; but it's highly unlikely that you care whether a > feature arrived in 7.1 or 7.2. The problem with this proposal is that > it will

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

"Shulgin, Oleksandr" writes: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> TBH, I think this is a horrid idea. We occasionally manually add remarks >> like "since version x.y, Postgres does this". Inevitably, that just bulks >> up the

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr < oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> >> It'll be a real >> mess if we do that for everything. >> > > I share the fear that it could become messy, but it doesn't

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

On 2015-08-31 10:48:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The problem with this proposal is that it will add far more bloat of > the latter sort than currently-useful information; and the ratio will > get worse over time. If we add that information in sane way we should be able to remove it automatically

[HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

Hello, I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced. Clicking through the "this page in other versions" links at the top of a webpage does help, but you still need to do some guessing (binary

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Shulgin, Oleksandr" writes: > > I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since > > when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced. > > It

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2015-08-31 13:06:04 +0200, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: > > I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since > > when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced. >

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

"Shulgin, Oleksandr" writes: > I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since > when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced. > It would be nice if we could make a script that would parse the sgml files > and for

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

Hi, On 2015-08-31 13:06:04 +0200, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote: > I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since > when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced. Same here. Not sure how to display it without getting disturbing the 'flow' of the

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova < a.lubennik...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > 31.08.2015 14:06, Shulgin, Oleksandr пишет: > > Hello, > > I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since > when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was

Re: [HACKERS] Adding since-version tags to the docs?

31.08.2015 14:06, Shulgin, Oleksandr пишет: Hello, I often find it pity that our docs are missing any information on since when a certain GUC setting, SQL-level command or function was introduced. Clicking through the "this page in other versions" links at the top of a webpage does help,