Robert Haas writes:
> Should we consider another generic options syntax, while we're on a
> roll? In the long run, that's the best way to avoid having a zillion
> keywords.
If there were any near-term prospect of more options for languages,
I might agree ... but there isn't, so I'm having a hard
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are some
things missing, notably the ability to create a language with an
anonymous-code-block handler. The only way you can do it is to have
a pg_pltemplate entry, which is certainly not good enough for languages
no
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:50:45PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are
> > some things missing, notably the ability to create a language with
> > an anonymous-code-block handler. The onl
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are some
> things missing, notably the ability to create a language with an
> anonymous-code-block handler. The only way you can do it is to have
> a pg_pltemplate entry, which is cert
I'm going through the anonymous-code-blocks patch now. There are some
things missing, notably the ability to create a language with an
anonymous-code-block handler. The only way you can do it is to have
a pg_pltemplate entry, which is certainly not good enough for languages
not distributed with t
