Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
On further reflection, it seems more in keeping with the coding
elsewhere in this module to treat this as a distinct dependency type,
instead of confusing it with a NORMAL dependency. There's no actual
functional difference at the moment, but more info is
Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
Hence, proposed patch attached (which also improves some of the related
comments).
+1 on the idea, although I'm not in a position to further review or play
with the patch today.
Further testing shows that
Whilst testing the schema-creation-permissions scenario that Kaigai-san
recently pointed out, I happened to do this:
regression=# create schema c;
CREATE SCHEMA
regression=# create extension cube with schema c;
CREATE EXTENSION
regression=# drop schema c;
DROP SCHEMA
... er, what? I was
I wrote:
... So I'm thinking this recursive call should
just pass DEPFLAG_NORMAL in all cases:
On further reflection, it seems more in keeping with the coding
elsewhere in this module to treat this as a distinct dependency type,
instead of confusing it with a NORMAL dependency. There's no
