Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >> On 06/08/2011 02:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > >>> Should we consider doing $SUBJECT? Given the plan to branch off 9.1 > > >>> after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second >

Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> On 06/08/2011 02:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Should we consider doing $SUBJECT? Given the plan to branch off 9.1 > >>> after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second > >>> pgindent run for 9.1. > > >>

Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> On 06/08/2011 02:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Should we consider doing $SUBJECT? Given the plan to branch off 9.1 >>> after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second >>> pgindent run for 9.1. >> OK, I have made sure the list o

Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 06/08/2011 02:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Should we consider doing $SUBJECT? Given the plan to branch off 9.1 > > after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second > > pgindent run for 9.1. > > > > > > OK, I have made sure

Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 06/08/2011 02:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Should we consider doing $SUBJECT? Given the plan to branch off 9.1 after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second pgindent run for 9.1. OK, I have made sure the list on the buildfarm is up to date. ch

Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-08 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 20:32, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Should we consider doing $SUBJECT?  Given the plan to branch off 9.1 >> after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second >> pgindent run for 9.1. > > +1. +1. --  Magnus H

Re: [HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-08 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Should we consider doing $SUBJECT?  Given the plan to branch off 9.1 > after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second > pgindent run for 9.1. +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Pos

[HACKERS] Another pgindent run before beta2?

2011-06-08 Thread Tom Lane
Should we consider doing $SUBJECT? Given the plan to branch off 9.1 after we make the beta release, I think it's now or never for a second pgindent run for 9.1. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to you

[HACKERS] Another pgindent run

2003-08-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
I forgot to update the typedefs for 7.4 before running pgindent. I would like to run it again, hopefully soon. It shouldn't change very much at all, but will recognize more of the typedefs. OK? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED]