Re: [HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?

On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Robert Creager writes: I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow Leopard) LLVM, perhaps, though are you sure that llvm and gcc aren't the same thing under the hood on SL? I thought I'd read somewhere that Apple had turned

Re: [HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?

Robert Creager writes: > I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow > Leopard) LLVM, perhaps, though are you sure that llvm and gcc aren't the same thing under the hood on SL? I thought I'd read somewhere that Apple had turned gcc into a wrapper around the llvm code gen

Re: [HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:29:29PM -0600, Robert Creager wrote: > > I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow > Leopard) The more, the merrier :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfet

[HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?

I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow Leopard) % /Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 --version i686-apple-darwin10-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2118) llvm-gcc-4.2 currently fails during check for the known directory probl