Re: [HACKERS] Array Parameters on protocol 3.0

2003-09-20 Thread Carlos Guzman Alvarez
Hello: Looks right to me. Either you have some small typo in your code, or the backend does ... let me know which ... Note that "insufficient data left in message" could arise from misformatting of an individual array element with respect to its individual value size, not only from a mistake at t

Re: [HACKERS] Array Parameters on protocol 3.0

2003-09-20 Thread Carlos Guzman Alvarez
Hello: Looks right to me. Either you have some small typo in your code, or the backend does ... let me know which ... Note that "insufficient data left in message" could arise from misformatting of an individual array element with respect to its individual value size, not only from a mistake at t

Re: [HACKERS] Array Parameters on protocol 3.0

2003-09-18 Thread Tom Lane
Carlos Guzman Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sending this for array parameters (in binary format): > * the number of dimensions. > * flags (always 0). > * base type of the array elements (oid). > * lengths and lower bounds. > * array values. >

[HACKERS] Array Parameters on protocol 3.0

2003-09-18 Thread Carlos Guzman Alvarez
Hello: I'm trying to give support to array parameters for sql commands in my .net data provider for postgres 7.4, i'm sending the same data as i need for read array field values but i get always the error : insufficient data left in message I'm sending this for array parameters (in binary for