On 04/07/2015 03:54 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-04-07 17:22:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
It might be a good idea to apply this if nothing better is forthcoming.
Logical decoding in WALsenders is broken at the moment.
Yes.
Committed.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (p
On 2015-04-07 17:22:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> It might be a good idea to apply this if nothing better is forthcoming.
> Logical decoding in WALsenders is broken at the moment.
Yes.
> Otherwise it needs to go on the 9.5 blockers list.
>
> But could we get rid of those active_count manipulat
On 11 February 2015 at 08:51, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
>
>
> The new xmin tracking code assumes that if a snapshots's regd_count > 0,
> it has already been pushed to the RegisteredSnapshots heap. That assumption
> doesn't hold because the logical decoding stuff creates its own snapshots
> and set
On 10 February 2015 at 21:43, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-02-10 22:06:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Andres Freund
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yea, it really looks like the above commit is to "blame". The new xmin
> > > tracking infrastructure doesn't know abou
On 02/10/2015 02:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-02-10 21:20:37 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Using test_decoding on HEAD (cc761b1) I am seeing the following assertion
failure:
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!((&RegisteredSnapshots)->ph_root ==
((void*)0)))", File: "snapmgr.c", Line: 677)
Ick. I
On 2015-02-10 22:06:34 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
>
> > Yea, it really looks like the above commit is to "blame". The new xmin
> > tracking infrastructure doesn't know about the historical snapshot...
> >
>
> I think that we need a bet
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Andres Freund
wrote:
> Yea, it really looks like the above commit is to "blame". The new xmin
> tracking infrastructure doesn't know about the historical snapshot...
>
I think that we need a better regression coverage here... For example, we
could add some tap te
Hi,
On 2015-02-10 21:20:37 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Using test_decoding on HEAD (cc761b1) I am seeing the following assertion
> failure:
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!((&RegisteredSnapshots)->ph_root ==
> ((void*)0)))", File: "snapmgr.c", Line: 677)
Ick. I guess a revert of 94028691609f8e148
Hi all,
Using test_decoding on HEAD (cc761b1) I am seeing the following assertion
failure:
TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!((&RegisteredSnapshots)->ph_root ==
((void*)0)))", File: "snapmgr.c", Line: 677)
(lldb) bt
* thread #1: tid = 0x, 0x7fff8b246d46 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__kill
+ 10, stop re
