[HACKERS] Autoconf update?

2005-05-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Does anyone object if we moved to Autoconf 2.59? It's been the last release for 18 months now, so it seems reasonable to settle on it. I'm not actually looking to use features from there, but it gets a bit annoying to have to keep so many Autoconf versions around. -- Peter Eisentraut

Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf update?

2005-05-30 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone object if we moved to Autoconf 2.59? It's been the last release for 18 months now, so it seems reasonable to settle on it. I'm not actually looking to use features from there, but it gets a bit annoying to have to keep so many

Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf update?

2005-05-30 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Well, it'll still be necessary to keep 2.53 around, unless you want to move to 2.59 for future releases of the back branches too ... which might be OK, I'm not sure. I thought it was to help the public not have to keep so many versions around :) Chris ---(end of