On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:07:42 -0400
Peter Martini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by breaking blobs transactional integrity.
> Do you mean by allowing filesystem type access, the blobs won't be
> properly locked and updated during a transaction? If so, that's
> exactly wha
I'm not sure what you mean by breaking blobs transactional integrity.
Do you mean by allowing filesystem type access, the blobs won't be
properly locked and updated during a transaction? If so, that's exactly
what I'm trying to achieve - a compromise between forcing the files to
be stored solely
Peter Martini writes:
Lately I've been planning work on a patch to postgres and linux on my
system to allow access to BLOBs as a virtual filesystem, so I can see
any file I put in there even through network shares while avoiding
duplication / broken link issues. Does this sound like something wo
Peter Martini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lately I've been planning work on a patch to postgres and linux on my
> system to allow access to BLOBs as a virtual filesystem, so I can see
> any file I put in there even through network shares while avoiding
> duplication / broken link issues. Does th
Lately I've been planning work on a patch to postgres and linux on my
system to allow access to BLOBs as a virtual filesystem, so I can see
any file I put in there even through network shares while avoiding
duplication / broken link issues. Does this sound like something worth
doing / is there a b
