On 3/27/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I removed the advertising clause from all the BSD-copyrighted files from
Berkeley, namely all but */blf.*.
Their upstream is OpenBSD that still has same license.
NetBSD and FreeBSD have even worse versions with ssleay
license.
I think I need
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Someone has pointed out that the following files have the 4-part BSD
> > copyright, which includes the advertising clause:
> >
> > src/backend/port/darwin/system.c
> > src/backend/port/dynloader/freebsd.c
> > src/backend/port/dynloader/openb
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rather than removing the copyright clause per se, it might be better to
> just update to the latest versions of these files in an upstream source
> (e.g. NetBSD). They've already gone through their source tree and
> updated the Berkeley copyrights as app
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Someone has pointed out that the following files have the 4-part BSD
copyright, which includes the advertising clause:
src/backend/port/darwin/system.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/freebsd.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/openbsd.c
src/backend/port/
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Someone has pointed out that the following files have the 4-part BSD
copyright, which includes the advertising clause:
src/backend/port/darwin/system.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/freebsd.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/openbsd.c
src/backend/port/
Someone has pointed out that the following files have the 4-part BSD
copyright, which includes the advertising clause:
src/backend/port/darwin/system.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/freebsd.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/openbsd.c
src/backend/port/dynloader/netbsd.c
