[HACKERS] Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

2002-08-15 Thread Barry Lind
I was just testing my product running on a 7.3 snapshot from a few days ago. And I ran into the following change in behavior that I consider a bug. You can no long insert large values into a bigint column without a cast. Small values (in the int range work fine though). On 7.3 I get: files

Re: [HACKERS] Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

2002-08-15 Thread Greg Copeland
Dang it...meant to mention that the other day when I was working on those python patches. I had to place tick marks (single quote) around the number and it was converted correctly. gcope=# insert into a values ( 99 ) ; ERROR: column "a" is of type 'bigint' but expression is of type 'dou

Re: [HACKERS] Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

2002-08-15 Thread Tom Lane
Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can no long insert large values into a bigint column without a > cast. This seems to be fallout from the move to tighten up implicit coercions (cf http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00528.php as well as lots of earlier discussions

Re: [HACKERS] Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

2002-08-16 Thread Barry Lind
Then shouldn't this appear on the "Open 7.3 issues" list that has been circulating around? This seems like an open issue to me, that needs to be addressed before 7.3 ships. --Barry Tom Lane wrote: >Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>You can no long insert large values into a bigi

Re: [HACKERS] Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

2002-08-16 Thread Tom Lane
Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then shouldn't this appear on the "Open 7.3 issues" list that has been > circulating around? It does. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Us

Re: [HACKERS] Bug/Change in behavior for 7.3 vs 7.2.1

2002-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
It is already there, I think: fix implicit type coercions that are worse --- Barry Lind wrote: > Then shouldn't this appear on the "Open 7.3 issues" list that has been > circulating around? This seems like an ope