Michael Paquier writes:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given that nobody actually cares what that sort order is, I think that
>> having to jump through hoops in pg_upgrade in order to fix it is not a
>> great tradeoff. I suggest changing the documentation to match the code
On 10.11.2016 09:54, Michael Paquier wrote:
Yes, definitely.
=# create table json_data (a jsonb);
CREATE TABLE
=# INSERT INTO json_data values ('{}'::jsonb), ('[]'::jsonb),
('null'::jsonb), ('true'::jsonb), ('1'::jsonb), ('""'::jsonb);
INSERT 0 6
=# SELECT * FROM json_data ORDER BY 1 DESC;
a
2016-11-10 13:54 GMT+07:00 Michael Paquier :
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Given that nobody actually cares what that sort order is, I think that
> > having to jump through hoops in pg_upgrade in order to fix it is not a
> > great tradeoff. I suggest changing the documen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-json.html
>
>> Indeed, I missed that. So that's broken...
>
> Given that nobody actually cares what that s
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-json.html
> Indeed, I missed that. So that's broken...
Given that nobody actually cares what that sort order is, I think that
having to jump through hoops in
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Nikita Glukhov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi hackers.
>>>
>>> While working on jsonbstatistics, I found the following bug:
>>> an empty jsonb array is considered
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Nikita Glukhov
> wrote:
>> Hi hackers.
>>
>> While working on jsonbstatistics, I found the following bug:
>> an empty jsonb array is considered to be lesser than any scalar,
>> but it is expected that object
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> Hi hackers.
>
> While working on jsonbstatistics, I found the following bug:
> an empty jsonb array is considered to be lesser than any scalar,
> but it is expected that objects > arrays > scalars.
Sources? Does the JSON spec contain any inf
Hi hackers.
While working on jsonbstatistics, I found the following bug:
an empty jsonb array is considered to be lesser than any scalar,
but it is expected that objects > arrays > scalars.
# select '[]'::jsonb < 'null'::jsonb;
?column?
--
t
(1 row)
Attached patch contains:
1. bug fi
