On 8 September 2016 at 11:18, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 8 September 2016 at 07:43, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich
>> wrote:
>>> Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable size
>>> GID,
>>> but several places that read that f
On 8 September 2016 at 07:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich
> wrote:
>> Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable size
>> GID,
>> but several places that read that files were not updated to use new offsets.
>> Problem
>> exi
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich
> wrote:
> > Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable
> size GID,
> > but several places that read that files were not updated to use new
> offsets. Problem
> > e
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich wrote:
> Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable size
> GID,
> but several places that read that files were not updated to use new offsets.
> Problem
> exists in master and 9.6 and can be reproduced on prepared transact
Hello.
Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable size GID,
but several places that read that files were not updated to use new offsets.
Problem
exists in master and 9.6 and can be reproduced on prepared transactions with
savepoints. For example:
create table t(id int
