Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch

2008-02-29 Thread Tom Lane
Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: This is unfortunate and surprising, since that patch was intended to prevent compilers from making unsafe alignment assumptions, but it sure looks like this compiler has instead added a new one. Could you poke into it ---

Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch

2008-02-28 Thread Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway
Tom Lane wrote: This is unfortunate and surprising, since that patch was intended to prevent compilers from making unsafe alignment assumptions, but it sure looks like this compiler has instead added a new one. Could you poke into it --- at least get a stack trace from the core dump? Forgot

Re: [HACKERS] Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch

2008-02-28 Thread Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway
Tom Lane wrote: It looks like gypsy_moth has been failing like this: creating directory /export/home/tmp/pg-test/build-suncc/HEAD/pgsql.21325/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data ... ok creating subdirectories ... ok selecting default max_connections ... 100 selecting default

[HACKERS] Buildfarm member gypsy_moth seems not to like alignment patch

2008-02-27 Thread Tom Lane
It looks like gypsy_moth has been failing like this: creating directory /export/home/tmp/pg-test/build-suncc/HEAD/pgsql.21325/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data ... ok creating subdirectories ... ok selecting default max_connections ... 100 selecting default shared_buffers/max_fsm_pages ...