Re: [HACKERS] CAN-2005-0247

2005-02-25 Thread yo mero
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:40:25 -0500, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yo mero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hello I saw this : > > http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2005-0247 > > is 8.0.1 Safe ? > > No --- at least not the source-code releases. Red Hat's 8.0.1 RPMs > incl

Re: [HACKERS] CAN-2005-0247

2005-02-25 Thread Tom Lane
yo mero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello I saw this : > http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2005-0247 > is 8.0.1 Safe ? No --- at least not the source-code releases. Red Hat's 8.0.1 RPMs include the patch, and I think the latest community RPMs do too. > is there a patch ? ht

[HACKERS] CAN-2005-0247

2005-02-25 Thread yo mero
Hello I saw this : http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2005-0247 is 8.0.1 Safe ? is there a patch ? thank you Leonel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joini