Re: [HACKERS] CVS compile on AIX 4.3.2

2003-07-15 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > I am getting the following error > > > ../../../../src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h:60: `int64_t' undeclared here (not > > > in a function) > > > > There's a patch floating around the list to remove use of int64_t, which > > is evidently not too portable

Re: [HACKERS] CVS compile on AIX 4.3.2

2003-07-15 Thread Tom Lane
Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > int64_t is a C99 data type that hasn't existed prior to recent > versions of gcc, but is quite valid/correct. I'd think that int64_t > support should be fudged on platforms where in64_t isn't defined as > long long. We have int64 defined (and well tes

Re: [HACKERS] CVS compile on AIX 4.3.2

2003-07-15 Thread Sean Chittenden
> > I am getting the following error > > ../../../../src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h:60: `int64_t' undeclared here (not > > in a function) > > There's a patch floating around the list to remove use of int64_t, which > is evidently not too portable. I'll try to get it applied soon. int64_t is a C99 da

Re: [HACKERS] CVS compile on AIX 4.3.2

2003-07-15 Thread Tom Lane
Samuel A Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am getting the following error > ../../../../src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h:60: `int64_t' undeclared here (not > in a function) There's a patch floating around the list to remove use of int64_t, which is evidently not too portable. I'll try to get it a

[HACKERS] CVS compile on AIX 4.3.2

2003-07-15 Thread Samuel A Horwitz
I am getting the following error gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/access/commo n' gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../sr c/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -c -o printtup.o printtup.c In file included from ../../../../sr